Email cleaning that shows its work
Email cleaners always felt like a black box. Upload a list, get a number back, no idea what got tossed or why. DataBridge runs 8 validators on every address - syntax, MX, typos, role accounts, disposables, duplicates, no-reply, risky TLDs. Each rejection tells you why. Plus auto-repair: gmial.com becomes gmail.com in one click, instead of just being deleted. Saves 3-8% of typical lists. Solo founder, 8 months in. Free: 1,000 rows/month, no card. Pro: $29/mo for 100k rows.

Screenshot 1

Screenshot 2

Screenshot 3

Screenshot 4

Screenshot 5

Screenshot 6

Screenshot 7

Screenshot 8

Screenshot 9
Sign in to your GMA account to leave a review and help others.
GMA Community
"Hey PH 👋I'm Damian, Solo founder, 8 months building DataBridge on nights and weekends.Why I built itkept seeing email lists where 10-20% of the rows were broken. Typos like gmial.com, role accounts, disposables, dead domains. The cleaners I tried treated it as a black box - upload a list, get back "84% valid!" and a bill. No reasoning, no way to fix what was fixable. I wanted one that showed its work.What it doesRuns 8 validators per address: syntax, MX records (does the domain actually have a mail server?), typo detection, role accounts, disposables, duplicate detection, no-reply patterns, risky TLDs. Each rejection comes with a sourced reason so you can see exactly why before deciding what to do.The part I'm most proud of is auto-repair. Instead of throwing out gmial.com addresses, we suggest the fix (gmail.com) and you approve in one click. Recovers 3-8% of typical lists that other cleaners just delete.StackNext.js 15 + Tailwind v4 + Supabase, async validation worker on Railway, Paddle for billing. The validation logic was the easy part. CSV parsing nearly killed me - BOM markers, mixed encodings, escaped commas, header rows that aren't really header rows. Rewrote the parser 3 times before it stopped crashing on real customer files.PricingFree tier 1,000 rows/month no card. Pro $29/mo for 100k rows + auto-repair.Brutal feedback welcome, especially from anyone running newsletters or B2B email. Two things I'd love feedback on: what audit fields you'd want that I don't have yet, and what would actually make you trust an "invalid" verdict enough to delete the row.(Especially curious about the second one - it's the trust gap I haven't fully figured out yet.)Thanks for reading 🙏"
GMA Community
"Well, well, I'm surprised...Very good product, fast and efficient!I uploaded a beautiful .csv loaded with emails and it immediately returned the incorrect ones, the ones that no longer work, or those with full mailboxes.Great for cleaning up my email list!"

Screenshot 10

Screenshot 11

Screenshot 12

Screenshot 13

Screenshot 14

Screenshot 15

Screenshot 16

Screenshot 17

Screenshot 18

Screenshot 19

Screenshot 20

Screenshot 21